ORTL argued that these First Amendment principles required the court to find the Abortion Mandate unconstitutional. In particular, ORTL noted that just last year the Supreme Court, in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission, reaffirmed that the First Amendment provides protection in cases like this, finding that a Wisconsin law with a remarkably similar exemption for narrowly defined religious entities violated the U.S. Constitution's requirement of religious neutrality by government.

The court agreed. Immediately after counsel's presentation of oral arguments on Tuesday, the judge announced from the bench that he was going to rule in ORTL's favor that the Abortion Mandate is unconstitutional because it violates ORTL's religious freedom under the First Amendment.

James Bopp, Jr., of The Bopp Law Firm, PC, lead counsel for ORTL, stated, “The First Amendment provides the plain guarantee that a state simply may not play favorites when it comes to religious organizations. It may not favor secular entities over entities with religious views and it may not favor one religious view over another. We are pleased that the court recognized these basic truths today, preventing Oregon from forcing ORTL to pay for the thing it is dedicated to fighting against.”

“The First Amendment protection of religious freedom is foundational to our understanding of freedom in our country,” Oregon Right to Life Executive Director Lois Anderson said. “From the beginning, we have asserted that Oregon's Mandate was unconstitutional and violated the rights of pro-life Oregonians. It was always absurd for Oregon to attempt to force Oregon Right to Life, as a pro-life organization, to fund abortion—the very practice we are dedicated to opposing. Yesterday, the federal court agreed. This is a win for Oregon Right to Life, but more than that, it is a victory for all pro-life Oregonians.”